TMPPM 2008 > Texas Medicaid Services > Hospital (Medical/Surgical Acute Care Facility) > Inpatient

   
 

25.2.4.2 Utilization Review Process

The inpatient UR process for admissions reimbursed under the DRG prospective payment system consists of sampling medical records of paid Medicaid claims. The review process consists of three major components:

Admission review. Determination of the medical necessity of the admission. For purposes of the Texas Medical Review Program (TMRP) and the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), medical necessity means the client has a condition requiring treatment that can be safely provided only in the inpatient setting.

Quality review. Assessment of the quality of care provided to determine if it meets generally accepted standards of medical and hospital care practices or puts the client at risk of unnecessary injury or death. Quality of care review includes the use of discharge screens and generic quality screens.

DRG validation. Determination that the critical elements necessary to assign a DRG are present in the medical record and the diagnosis and procedures are sequenced correctly. The critical elements are age, sex, admission date, discharge date, discharge status, principal diagnosis, secondary diagnosis (complications or comorbidity), and principal and secondary procedures.

The HHSC OIG UR Unit staff reviews the complete medical record to make decisions about the medical necessity of the admission, validity of the DRG, and quality of care. The medical record must reflect that any services reimbursed by the Texas Medicaid Program were ordered by the attending physician, certified nurse-midwife, or nurse practitioner.

Effective for dates of admission on or after September 1, 2006, the HHSC OIG UR Unit uses evidence-based guidelines to assist in performing retrospective UR of inpatient hospital claims for Medicaid clients. The evidence-based guidelines are Milliman Care Guidelines, which replace the physician-developed and physician-approved Medicaid hospital screening criteria addressed through a rule revision effective August 1, 2006. Reviews required by the TMRP, TEFRA, and the current LoneSTAR Select II contracting Program are included.

All services, supplies, or items billed are medically necessary for the client's diagnosis or treatment as certified on claim submission.

Refer to: "Provider Certification/Assignment" .

When an admission denial or a denial of continued stay is issued, or when a technical denial becomes final, all money is recouped from the hospital for the admission or the days of stay denied. When a DRG is reassigned as a result of UR, the payment to the hospital is adjusted.

If an inpatient admission is denied, but a physician's order is present documenting the client originally was placed in observation, the UR unit may authorize the rebilling of services rendered during the first 23 hours on an outpatient claim.

Admission Review

Review personnel assess the medical necessity of an admission by comparing documentation present in the medical record with elements in the TMRP Hospitalization Screening Criteria. For an admission to be approved, an indication for hospitalization and treatment criteria must be met. Cases that do not meet both screening criteria are referred to a physician consultant for determination of the medical necessity of the inpatient admission. If the TMRP Hospitalization Screening Criteria are met but the medical necessity of the admission is still questionable, the case is referred to a physician consultant for a determination. If a physician consultant determines the admission is not medically necessary, a denial is issued.

Effective for admissions on or after September 1, 2006, review personnel assess the medical necessity of an admission by comparing documentation present in the medical record using recognized evidence-based guidelines for inpatient screening criteria. Non-physician reviewers use the criteria as guidelines for the initial approval or for the referral of inpatient reviews for medical necessity decisions. Cases that do not meet initial approval are referred to a physician consultant for the determination of the medical necessity of the inpatient admission. If the criteria are met but the medical necessity of the admission is still questionable, the case is referred to a physician consultant for a determination. If a physician consultant determines the admission is not medically necessary, a denial is issued.

Compliance with the DRG prospective payment system and aspects of the review as stated above are evaluated quarterly. Identified problems may result in an educational visit or action such as recoupment or referral to HHSC OIG Medicaid Program Integrity (MPI) for determination of a sanction.

Readmission Review

If a hospital admission or readmission occurs within 30 days of a previous discharge from the same or a different hospital for the same or closely related diagnosis, or for a condition identified during the previous admission, it may be reviewed for medical necessity.

Transfers from one facility to another and readmissions are also subject to review.

Hospital-Based Ambulatory (HASC) Surgical Procedures

Inpatient admissions for surgical procedures listed as ambulatory surgical codes in the current fee schedule are denied if documentation does not support the need for the inpatient admission.

Quality Review

Each Medicaid case is evaluated for quality client care, adequacy of discharge planning, and medical stability of the client at discharge. To accomplish this review, CMS Generic Quality Screens and discharge screens included in the TMRP Hospitalization Screening Criteria are used. Potential quality of care issues are identified by the physician. HHSC contracts with physician consultants to review medical records for quality of care. Physician consultants, of the specialty related to the care rendered, may make clinical recommendations or determine corrective actions when deemed appropriate. Child and adolescent psychiatrists may make recommendations based on review of inpatient psychiatric services provided to Medicaid clients younger than 21 years of age. Failure to verify completion of any corrective action recommendation within the specified time frame may result in referral of the case to the HHSC OIG, MPI section, for possible payment hold (withholding Medicaid claims payments until verification of the completed corrective action has been received) and/or exclusion from the Texas Medicaid Program.

Diagnosis-Related Group Validation

Each medical record is reviewed to validate the elements critical to the DRG assignment. These elements are the client's age, sex, admission date, discharge date, discharge status, principal diagnosis, secondary diagnoses (complications or comorbidities), and principal and secondary procedures. Documentation of these critical DRG elements in the medical record is evaluated for the correlation to the information provided on the claim form.

The principal diagnosis is the diagnosis (condition) established after study to be chiefly responsible for causing the admission of the client to the hospital for care. The principal diagnosis must be treated or evaluated during this admission to the hospital.

The secondary diagnoses are conditions that affect client care in terms of requiring clinical evaluation, therapeutic treatment, diagnostic procedures, extended length of hospital stay, increased nursing care and/or monitoring, or has clinically significant implications for future health-care needs.

The coding of diagnoses that have clinically significant implications for future health-care needs applies only to newborns and must be identified by the physician. Normal newborn conditions or routine procedures are not to be considered as complications or comorbidities for DRG assignment.

Refer to: "Texas Medicaid Program Limitations and Exclusions" .

If the principal diagnosis, secondary diagnoses (complications or co-morbidities), or procedures are not substantiated in the medical record; sequenced correctly; or have been omitted, codes may be deleted, changed, or added. All diagnosis/procedure coding changes potentially resulting in a DRG change are referred to a physician consultant. When it is determined that the diagnoses and procedures are substantiated and sequenced correctly, the information will be entered into the applicable version of the Grouper software for a DRG determination. The CMS-approved DRG software considers each diagnosis and procedure and the combination of all codes and elements to make a determination of the final DRG assignment. When the DRG is reassigned, the payment to the provider is adjusted.


Texas Medicaid & Healthcare Partnership
CPT only copyright 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PreviousNextIndex